<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Future of Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureofprivacy.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Shows Cybersecurity Risks from FBI “Going Dark” Proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/17/new-report-shows-cybersecurity-risks-from-fbi-going-dark-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/17/new-report-shows-cybersecurity-risks-from-fbi-going-dark-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjerome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s New York Times discusses a major new report by 20 technologists about the cybersecurity risks that would result an FBI plan to expand wiretapping capabilities on the Internet.  The administration is reportedly close to sending the FBI proposal to Capitol Hill, to amend the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act of 1994. FPF Senior [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/17/new-report-shows-cybersecurity-risks-from-fbi-going-dark-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Scary About Big Data, and How to Confront It</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/06/whats-scary-about-big-data-and-how-to-confront-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/06/whats-scary-about-big-data-and-how-to-confront-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjerome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any discussion surrounding the benefits&#8211;and the risks&#8211;presented by Big Data often focuses on the far-off future.  The world of Minority Report is frequently invoked, but in the wake of April’s “Big Data Week,” it is time to recognize that Big Data is already here.  In their recent book, Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/06/whats-scary-about-big-data-and-how-to-confront-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Shows Need for De-identification Best Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/02/new-study-shows-need-for-de-identification-best-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/02/new-study-shows-need-for-de-identification-best-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjerome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publically releasing sensitive information is risky.  In 1997, Latanya Sweeney used full date of birth, 5 digit ZIP code, and gender to show that seemingly anonymous medical data could be linked to an actual person when she uncovered the health information of William Weld, the former governor of Massachusetts.   Sweeney in a new study analyzes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/05/02/new-study-shows-need-for-de-identification-best-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Issues Updated FAQs</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/ftc-issues-updated-faqs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/ftc-issues-updated-faqs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hfederman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FTC has just released its updated FAQs on the new COPPA rules. We have a post about the key points about apps on our educational app developer site,  ApplicationPrivacy.org. &#160; &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/ftc-issues-updated-faqs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Not Track Hearing Takeaways</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/do-not-track-hearing-takeaways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/do-not-track-hearing-takeaways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjerome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organized by Sen. Rockefeller (D-W. Virginia), who has repeatedly pushed for a “Do Not Track” law, yesterday’s Senate Commerce Commerce Committee hearing  on Do Not Track (DNT) was billed as an opportunity for industry to provide senators with an update on how voluntary DNT standards were proceeding.  Joined by Senators Blumenthal, Heller, McCaskill, and Thune, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/25/do-not-track-hearing-takeaways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPF Senior Fellow Peter Swire&#8217;s Op-Ed on Do Not Track</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/24/fpf-senior-fellow-peter-swires-op-ed-on-do-not-track/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/24/fpf-senior-fellow-peter-swires-op-ed-on-do-not-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hfederman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do Not Track Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Fellows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FPF Senior Fellow and the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Professor Peter Swire wrote an Op-Ed today for Wired on &#8220;How To Prevent the &#8216;Do Not Track&#8217; Arms Race.&#8221; The article highlights the challenges of implementation and the need for a multistakeholder negotiated Do Not Track standard. &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/24/fpf-senior-fellow-peter-swires-op-ed-on-do-not-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techworld: Our Internet Privacy is at risk &#8211; but not dead (yet)</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/23/techworld-our-internet-privacy-is-at-risk-but-not-dead-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/23/techworld-our-internet-privacy-is-at-risk-but-not-dead-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>System Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With this year declared, &#8220;The Year of Privacy on Steroids&#8221; companies, policy makers and professional experts alike agree that privacy is essential but the real conversation on the matter is, where is the sliver lining? Future of Privacy Forum&#8217;s own, Jules Polonetsky, shared his own professional expertise on the topic specifically when it comes to companies tracking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/23/techworld-our-internet-privacy-is-at-risk-but-not-dead-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Thoughts from &#8220;This Week in the Boardroom&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/19/interesting-thoughts-from-this-week-in-the-boardroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/19/interesting-thoughts-from-this-week-in-the-boardroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>System Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some wise thoughts on privacy and security for corporate boards, from FPF Advisory Board member Russell Schrader. To watch this video click here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/19/interesting-thoughts-from-this-week-in-the-boardroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Drones Should Embrace Privacy by Design</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/05/domestic-drones-should-embrace-privacy-by-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/05/domestic-drones-should-embrace-privacy-by-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jjerome</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, the FAA held an online forum to seek input from members of the public on the agency’s development of a privacy policy for unmanned aircraft systems, or civilian drones. For two hours, privacy advocates, engineers, and representatives of the unmanned aircraft industry went around in circles debating whether drones even present novel privacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/04/05/domestic-drones-should-embrace-privacy-by-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Obscurity Could Help the Right To Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/03/29/how-obscurity-could-help-the-right-to-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/03/29/how-obscurity-could-help-the-right-to-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annemarie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofprivacy.org/?p=9291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a post on Policy@Intel, David Hoffman explains why Internet obscurity can help the &#8220;Right to Fail.&#8221;  Absent providing individuals with &#8220;a sphere of privacy where they know they can make mistakes,&#8221; society may make it impossible for individuals to pursue ideas that &#8220;challenge the status quo&#8221; and are needed &#8220;to break away from conformity [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.futureofprivacy.org/2013/03/29/how-obscurity-could-help-the-right-to-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.futureofprivacy.org @ 2013-05-20 11:22:54 by W3 Total Cache -->