Missing the Consumer Value of Social Media

Missing the Consumer Value of Social Media

I love Consumer Reports.   I rely on the magazine for top notch reviews.  Their testing of consumer products is unbiased and invaluable to anyone who takes both price and value seriously. I am currently looking to purchase a quality home treadmill and was pleased to see that a recent issue included a detailed report based on hands on testing and detailed consumer surveys.  But before I make a final decision, I will reach out to my Facebook social network friends for their input.  Some of them will have personal experience researching this type of purchase, others will know me and my foibles and perhaps advise that I get one that works with the new fitness apps available or a longer track so I don’t fall off while multi-tasking.

Facebook and other social media tools have empowered consumers more than any other development in many years, except perhaps for the creation of Consumer Reports itself.  Consumers have a megaphone to voice and spread their concerns about any business or product in a way that demands a reaction.  Companies dedicate special teams to follow opinions about their brands on social media and employ specialists to respond to individual concerns.

Certainly social media has its downsides.  Despite improvements in recent years, privacy controls are still not intuitive.  For years, posting online was public while email and chat were private.  Now, depending on our settings and which service we are using, our posts may be public, our pictures may be private and our location check-ins may be available to “friends of friends”.  It can get very complicated.

What’s the point of sharing with a friend of a friend? The other day I was complaining on Facebook about a new airplane baggage fee when a friend responded to commiserate.  But then she tagged her friend the travel agent who jumped in with great expert advice about how to avoid that fee.  Privacy concerns about sharing my travel plans?  In my neighborhood, folks on my block and friends of my kids know when we are on vacation.  If I forget to stop the newspaper delivery, they pick it up for me.  Don’t announce it to the general public, where some crook may scour public information for evil purposes.  But online or offline, sharing with your friends or community does far more to empower most of us than it does to create any new risks.

I was surprised therefor to see the harshly negative general view Consumer Reports took towards Facebook in the issue released yesterday.  I expected criticism of the usability of privacy controls or complaints about apps that ask consumers for more information than they need.  Facebook is aware of those issues and is working with our think tank and others on the best ways to continue to make progress ensuring that the thousands of developers who create their own consumer apps use data responsibly.  But Consumer Reports seems to be taking the view that social media sharing is by definition a bad idea, even when people are sharing with their own friends.  True, things posted privately can be further shared, but that’s the case with much of what we do online and the price for convenience we make every day when we use email to send information around the world.

Consumer Reports notes with alarm that millions of people are publicly showing support for the battles against various illnesses by publicly “liking” pages dedicated to the diseases.  I would like to urge more consumers to “like” the fights to cure and de-stigmatize disease.  And I think it is preposterous to think that if I announce that I am attending a march to raise money to fund breast cancer research that an insurer will be able to use it against me.  Are there any companies that are mistreating people for such activity? I would like Consumer Reports to find out, so I can denounce them on Facebook for my friends to read and pass on and on.

It was also surprising to see media reports alarmed at Consumer Reports finding that 13 million people were unfamiliar with Facebook privacy controls.  With 188 million users in Facebook and Canada (the regions surveyed) this means that more than 90% of users say they are familiar with the controls.  That is remarkably positive!

Certainly folks who post compromising pictures or comments, on Facebook or on blogs or anywhere public, should understand that friends, employers, colleges, prospective dates will judge you.  Do a search using Google and see what shows up.  You have a digital identity that is being used to assess you, just like the clothes you wear every day and the people you associate with form your public identity.  As more is available online, Facebook, Google and others needs to help us shape that identity to put our best self forward to those who are interested in us.  Which online services are doing the most to help consumers pro-actively shape their reputations and empower them to make smarter decisions?  That’s the Consumer Reports study that I would like to see.  But by applying a pessimistic eye towards social media in general as it conducted this survey, this month’s Consumer Reports magazine isn’t going to be a “best value” for today’s online consumer.

 

-Jules Polonetsky

Leave a Reply


Privacy Calendar

Apr
24
Thu
all-day 6th Biannual International Surveillance & Society Conference
6th Biannual International Surve…
Apr 24 – Apr 25 all-day
The 6th Biannual International Surveillance & Society conference hosted by the University of Barcelona and supported by the Surveillance Studies Network is currently calling for [...]
Apr
29
Tue
all-day IAPP Europe Data Protection Intensive 2014
IAPP Europe Data Protection Inte…
Apr 29 – May 1 all-day
The IAPP Europe Data Protection Intensive features timely programming centred on the top issues impacting the European data protection community, with a focus on addressing [...]
Apr
30
Wed
5:30 pm InSecurity: Race, Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age @ New America Foundation
InSecurity: Race, Surveillance a… @ New America Foundation
Apr 30 @ 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
Now more than ever, digital tools sit at a precarious tipping point, and many question whether they will be used to address pre-existing disparities, [...]
May
2
Fri
all-day Foreign Intelligence Surveillance in an Era of “Big Data” @ Jacob Burns Moot Court Room, George Washington Law School
Foreign Intelligence Surveillanc… @ Jacob Burns Moot Court Room, George Washington Law School
May 2 all-day
Discussions: Panel 1: Why Do We Conduct Foreign Intelligence Surveillance? What Are the Requirements? Panel 2: Making the Trade-Offs Between Surveillance and Civil Liberties Panel [...]
May
7
Wed
all-day IAPP Canada Privacy Symposium 2014
IAPP Canada Privacy Symposium 2014
May 7 – May 9 all-day
The IAPP Canada Privacy Symposium is the leading conference for education, debate and discussion of issues that matter most to Canadian privacy and data protection [...]
Jun
5
Thu
all-day Privacy Law Scholars Conference (7th Annual) @ The George Washington School of Law
Privacy Law Scholars Conference … @ The George Washington School of Law
Jun 5 – Jun 6 all-day
  UC Berkeley School of Law and The George Washington University Law School will be holding the seventh annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference (PLSC) on [...]
Jun
8
Sun
all-day Computers, Freedom, and Privacy 2014 Conference @ Airlie Center
Computers, Freedom, and Privacy … @ Airlie Center
Jun 8 – Jun 10 all-day
Mark your calendars! The 2014 Computers, Freedom, and Privacy Conference will be held June 8-10 at the Airlie Center in Warrenton, Virginia. The Airlie Center [...]
Jan
28
Wed
all-day Data Privacy Day
Data Privacy Day
Jan 28 all-day
“Data Privacy Day began in the United States and Canada in January 2008, as an extension of the Data Protection Day celebration in Europe. The [...]

View Calendar