The Future of Privacy Forum Consumer Privacy Agenda for the New Administration

The Future of Privacy Forum Consumer Privacy Agenda for the New Administration

1. Appoint a Chief Privacy Officer to Promote Fair Information Practices in the Public and Private Sectors.

We embrace the idea of government catching up to industry by creating the central role of a Chief Technology Officer, as has been announced. But we also point out the need — recognized by hundreds of privacy-sensitive companies — for a senior level Chief Privacy Officer, someone to ensure that data protection is a central consideration for technology, data and policy decisions. Although many federal agencies have privacy officers, the fact that data is increasingly available across government entities demonstrates the need for a central figure to lead U.S. efforts to respect citizen data. To ensure that the data needed to combat terror will be available while appropriate oversight is in place to protect essential freedoms, the Administration should have an accountable, executive-level figure to drive an agenda based on responsible data practices. And as behavioral targeting, correlation of data across platforms, cloud computing and the use of personal health records becomes widespread in the business world, the need for a senior figure who can drive a consumer-centric agenda based on Fair Information Practices becomes increasingly crucial.

As data flows have already become a global issue, an empowered central address for U.S. data protection will also more effectively allow the U.S. to engage with data authorities around the world.

2. Ensure that Interactive Tools used by Government Provide Users with Enhanced Transparency and Controls.

Federal policy today requires that government Web sites refrain from using persistent cookies without agency head approval. As a result, government sites either go without the benefit of data-driven services that could optimize their usage and performance, or simply obtain agency approval and make use of such cookies without additional safeguards. At a time when citizens expect a widely expanded form of e-government, including social media and commercial Web 2.0 tools, refraining from the use of innovative tools is not an option. But also unacceptable would be simply using the tools that are available on the market today, without enhanced responsible data use rules.

The OMB and the E-Government Administrator should establish baseline principles for cookies, social media tools and other information use by commercial vendors for government. In doing so, they will drive responsible development of these tools for government and for industry. For example, analytics tools should be required to delete log-files after a defined period of time, cookies should have limited expiration periods and should not be used to store information unprotected, IP addresses should be obscured as soon as possible, and the use of the tools and user options should be transparent and prominently explained. In addition, a very limited amount of funding for basic research could challenge our best and brightest researchers to create completely new technologies that would deliver the benefit of current day cookies while also increasing transparency and truly protecting privacy.

The Federal government can lead the way in driving companies to provide consumer-centric services that provide users control over data. We propose modeling a set of requirements similar to the concept of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which requires federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities. Section 508 was enacted to eliminate barriers in information technology, to make available new opportunities for people with disabilities and to encourage development of technologies that will help achieve these goals. We live today in a society where the public has different abilities with regard to managing data collection. As our government Web sites become increasingly interactive, the federal government should require that federally-supported agencies and grantees drive requirements to provide users with enhanced transparency and controls.

3. Establish a Standard Definition of Personal Information.

Most privacy commitments today rely on a definition of personal information, but with the exception of a few statutes such as HIPPA and Gramm Leach Bliley, the interpretations of what constitutes personal information are wide ranging. Companies rely on a myriad of methods, from encryption to simple encoding to use purportedly non-personal information to aggregate, track, and target robust amounts and types of on- and off-line data. NIST should work with the FTC and the proposed Chief Privacy Officer to establish standards for levels of anonymity and identifiability.

4. Increase Technology and Research Support for the Federal Trade Commission

The FTC must become a technology leader to further increase its effectiveness in understanding and countering increasingly complex threats to individual privacy. It should have a significantly expanded team of technologists and an enhanced operations center to track and respond to abuses. The FTC should be provided with authority and funding for Centers of Excellence that can lead research into how to communicate about privacy to users. It should also develop a deeper liaison relationship with the academic and security research communities so that it can both respond to new concerns and help guide external efforts on the type of research that is of value to Commission staff. The FTC should also develop a major effort to evaluate and promote the use of Privacy Enabling Technologies (PETS) that can be used to mask personal information while allowing for robust information use in commerce and analysis.

5. Enhance Criminal Law Enforcement Support for the Federal Trade Commission

The FBI and DOJ must allocate their limited resources to combat terror and prosecute child predators, and are currently unable to adequately attend to the increasingly dangerous criminals involved in spam, spyware, phishing, identity theft and malware. Appropriate global criminal law enforcement support must be dedicated to support the efforts of the FTC so that it can use its expertise to ensure full prosecution of those responsible for these threats to user data. Although there has been increased cooperation between criminal law agencies and the FTC in recent years, dedicated support would ensure that serious harms uncovered by the FTC would lead to a significant threat of criminal charges, as opposed to only civil action.

Example: Malvertising: Major portals, ad networks and publishers are inundated with “malvertising attacks”. Criminal groups purchase banner ads from unsuspecting networks, and these ads morph into attacks that hijack the browsers of Web surfers who simply view the banner. Despite an impact that has affected millions of users and thousands of networks, the response has been limited to the FTC’s civil enforcement efforts. No coordinated criminal effort from law enforcement is in place to respond to this threat.

6. Provide National Leadership to Resolve the Conflict between Privacy and Online Safety for Youth.

State enforcement actions by Attorneys General have sought to require social networks to implement systems that would require the authentication of many users. Although tools to accurately authenticate minors are not currently available, the ability of users to exercise control over their online identity will be undermined if such efforts do not adequately take into account the privacy impact of many authentication services. The Administration should create a National Internet Safety Technical Task Force to develop a national policy that balances conflicting pressures for online authentication, age screening, and child safety vs. online identity and privacy. Shortly, the Internet Safety Technical Task Force, created by the settlement between social networking sites and 49 Attorneys General, will present its final report. The conclusions of this effort and additional examination of this issue should form the basis for a national policy that promotes online privacy while equally ensuring that our youth are protected.

Note: The NTIA just issued a request for individuals to serve on the NTIA Online Safety and Technology Working Group, which will provide a report to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce on ways to promote a safe Internet environment for children. This effort should be replaced by a senior-level effort, including representation from the Attorneys General, Members of Congress, advocates, academics and industry experts. This would ensure a unified government approach and provide greater likelihood of achieving national consensus on this issue.

7. Encourage Accountable Business Models

The Internet has led to the development of highly-efficient business models, by which companies collaborate and combine their individual expertise to provide a customer service. A user, by requesting one Web page, can share data with dozens of companies – a Web publisher, an ad network, an ad exchange, a search engine, an analytics company, a content distribution network, multiple advertisers and more. Despite the fact that consumers may believe the brand they are visiting is responsible for the data activity on the page, the complexity, lack of transparency and, sometimes, bargaining power imbalance has created a situation where data flows are dispersed and responsibility is often unclear. The DOC should partner with the FTC and industry groups to address this problem and identify steps that may foster accountable online business models.

——————————————————————-

The above proposals do not intend to cover the full range of privacy issues facing the new administration. Rather, we seek to highlight areas that affect consumers and in which we have particular insight because of our experience as a Chief Privacy Officer and the leader of a major law firm privacy practice. Other important issues, such as those relating to civil liberties and law enforcement, government use of private-sector data, revisions to the Privacy Act of 1974, and other concerns have been raised by groups such as the Center for Democracy and Technology. We call those to your attention.

We also call to your attention the importance of consumer confidence in e-commerce. If the misuse of data led to an erosion of consumer trust regarding e-commerce, the economic impact would be significant.

Leave a Reply


Privacy Calendar

Jan
26
Mon
8:30 am Privacy as a Profit Center: Leve... @ Old Slip by Convene
Privacy as a Profit Center: Leve... @ Old Slip by Convene
Jan 26 @ 8:30 am – Jan 27 @ 4:15 pm
Learn how those on the leading edge of privacy governance and digital innovation from companies including Cigna, Cisco Systems, eBay Inc. Public Policy Lab, FocusMotion,Ghostery, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Google, HP Enterprise Security Products, JPMorgan[...]
Jan
28
Wed
all-day Data Privacy Day
Data Privacy Day
Jan 28 – Jan 29 all-day
“Data Privacy Day began in the United States and Canada in January 2008, as an extension of the Data Protection Day celebration in Europe. The Day commemorates the 1981 signing of Convention 108, the first[...]
Mar
4
Wed
all-day Global Privacy Summit 2015
Global Privacy Summit 2015
Mar 4 – Mar 6 all-day
For more information, click here.
Mar
10
Tue
6:00 pm CDT Annual Dinner “TechProm” 2015
CDT Annual Dinner “TechProm” 2015
Mar 10 @ 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm
Featuring the most influential minds of the tech policy world, CDT’s annual dinner, TechProm, highlights the issues your organization will be facing in the future and provides the networking opportunities that can help you tackle[...]
Mar
13
Fri
all-day BCLT Privacy Law Forum
BCLT Privacy Law Forum
Mar 13 all-day
This program will feature leading academics and practitioners discussing the latest developments in privacy law. UC Berkeley Law faculty and conference panelists will discuss cutting-edge scholarship and explore ‘real world’ privacy law problems. Click here[...]
May
27
Wed
all-day PL&B’s Asia-Pacific Roundtable (...
PL&B’s Asia-Pacific Roundtable (...
May 27 all-day
PROFESSOR GRAHAM GREENLEAF, Asia-Pacific Editor, Privacy Laws & Business International Report, will lead a roundtable on the countries of most interest to business in the Asia-Pacific region. Click here for more information.
Jul
6
Mon
all-day PL&B’s 28th Annual International...
PL&B’s 28th Annual International...
Jul 6 – Jul 8 all-day
The Privacy Laws & Business 27th Annual International Conference featured more than 40 speakers and chairs from many countries over 3 intensive days. At the world’s longest running independent international privacy event participants gained professionally by[...]

View Calendar